Continuing patient access to innovative treatment options
Continuing patient access to innovative treatment options
Send Your Letter
Submit your written public comments via your email
Feel free to customize the letter to your liking before sending
Open Pre-Filled Email Alternatively, you can manually send an email to policydraft@noridian.com
and moldx.policy@palmettogba.com with your message
Letter
Subject: Response to Proposed LCD for MolDX: Testing for Solid Organ Allograft Rejection
To Whom It May Concern,
My name is Dr. **[XX]**, I am a **[TITLE/SPECIALTY]** at **[INSTITUTION]**. I have been caring for transplant patients for
over **[XX]** years, and have been using molecular diagnostics
for transplant recipients to care **[FOR DETERMINING REJECTION,
AVOIDING BIOPSY, TITRATING IMMUNOSUPPRESSION]**. My credentials
include **[LIST ANY HONORS, MAJOR ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS, OR SOCIETY
APPOINTMENTS]**.
The proposed LCD for MolDX: Molecular Testing for Solid Organ Allograft
Rejection, released on August 10, 2023, effectively limits my ability to
care for lung transplant recipients and imposes unrealistic testing
restrictions for my center and my patients.
The policy’s changes to the frequency of molecular surveillance testing based
on center-specific biopsy protocols as well as the exclusion of concurrent
biopsy will impact our ability to improve care of lung transplant recipients.
These restrictions will stifle innovation that is so desperately needed to
improve patient care and outcomes in lung transplantation.
• Limiting the frequency of testing to center-specific protocol
biopsies is flawed given the fundamentally disparate risk profile of a
non-invasive blood test from an invasive procedure with known risks of
complication.
I request MolDX to strongly reconsider implementing this proposed LCD which
would be vastly detrimental to my care of transplant recipients.
• Center-specific surveillance biopsy schedules represent a desire
to balance the utility of surveillance against the risks of an invasive
procedure and logistic considerations such as travel time to a transplant
center. Surveillance biopsy schedules, limited as described, should not be
conflated with evidence-based surveillance interval of a noninvasive
test.
My center currently uses ** [DD-CFDNA TEST]** on
a **[FREQUENCY] ** basis to assess
for **[ACUTE REJECTION AS WELL AS CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT
INFECTIONS].** With the changes imposed above, we will no longer
be able to provide the best transplant patient care.
I request MolDX to strongly reconsider implementing this proposed LCD which
would be vastly detrimental to my care of transplant patients.
Sincerely,
**[SIGNATURE/NAME]**